The Earth is Flat!!...? No it’s round.Where's my alchemist?
April 12, 1633: Galileo is convicted of heresy On April 12, 1633, chief inquisitor Father Vincenzo Maculani da Firenzuola, appointed by Pope Urban VIII, begins the inquisition of physicist and astronomer Galileo Galilei.
Galileo was ordered to turn himself in to the Holy Office to begin trial for holding the belief that the Earth revolves around the Sun, which was deemed heretical by the Catholic Church. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/galileo-is-convicted-of-heresy
October 31, 1992: After 350 Years, Vatican Says Galileo Was Right It took the Catholic Church 350 years to admit they were wrong...
IF renewable energy / Green New Deal is bogus, how long will it take the world to admit it?
Can it ever?
Why eco-leftists are suddenly turning on Michael Moore??
https://nypost.com/2020/05/02/why-eco-leftists-are-suddenly-turning-on-michael-moore/
The Earth is Flat!!...? No it’s round.
April 12, 1633: Galileo is convicted of heresy
On April 12, 1633, chief inquisitor Father Vincenzo Maculani da Firenzuola, appointed by Pope Urban VIII, begins the inquisition of physicist and astronomer Galileo Galilei. Galileo was ordered to turn himself in to the Holy Office to begin trial for holding the belief that the Earth revolves around the Sun, which was deemed heretical by the Catholic Church.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/galileo-is-convicted-of-heresy
October 31, 1992: After 350 Years, Vatican Says Galileo Was Right
It took the Catholic Church 350 years to admit they were wrong,
IF renewable energy / Green New Deal is bogus, how long will it take the world to admit it?
Can it ever?
Why eco-leftists are suddenly turning on Michael Moore
https://nypost.com/2020/05/02/why-eco-leftists-are-suddenly-turning-on-michael-moore/
“The environmental movement has basically become a religion, or rather a kind of hybrid between religion and political ideology.”
Thilo Spahl: “You founded Greenpeace 40 years ago; today you fight Greenpeace. What went wrong in the meantime?”
Patrick Moore: “Much has gone wrong over the years. In summary: when Greenpeace started, it was not just about the environment, but also about the people. ‘Green’ stood for the environment and ‘Peace’ for ending the threat of global nuclear war and the destruction of human civilisation.
Over the years, Greenpeace drifted to where the organisation now characterises people as the enemies of the earth. This is a very different approach and not one I wanted to join. Human beings are part of the earth.”
Environmentalism has become a religion—2014
Patrick Moore, founder of Greenpeace
https://www.spiked-online.com/2014/05/19/environmentalism-has-become-a-religion/
“What we have been calling green, renewable energy and industrial civilization are one and the same thing - desperate measures not to save the planet but to save our way of life,"
Planet of the Humans—2020
Jeff Gibbs // Michael Moore
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE
Michael Moore Just Declared War on the Climate Movement
“What we’re trying to get across is the larger point that it doesn’t even matter if they’re 100 percent efficient,” Gibbs said of renewables. “The story is that they're still part of a giant industrial civilization that consumes resources.”
https://nypost.com/2020/05/02/why-eco-leftists-are-suddenly-turning-on-michael-moore/
Renewables?
Nearly half of ALL renewable? Depletes natural resources
Largest percentage of all renewable “green” energy comes from biomass products; trees, plants, animals
Rather than being carbon neutral, biomass is liquidating millions of tons of irreplaceable carbon stocks in the midst of a climate crisis already out of control.
ALL renewable energy forms consume resources, are inefficient (no more than 20% efficiency), and produce dangerous toxic waste & bi-product
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/renewable-sources/
Green Economics — Religion to Reality
https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2012/number/3/article/green-growth.html
Bloomberg “Renewable Energy”
--Wind
--Solar
--Other (yet other comprises nearly half, and the majority is biomass—trees, plants & animals
Sooo
It’s better for the earth, better for humans to eradicate, cut down, chop down, kill off to keep the energy consumption status-quo?
Bloomberg has already donated more than $150 million to the Sierra Club and other environmental organizations as part of his previous environmental campaign, known as Beyond Coal.
He bought off the Sierra Club, do he could harvest the worlds trees
The world, it’s poor peoples and natural resources will be decimated, turned to profit, harvested, and abandoned. A toxic wasteland everywhere
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/06/climate/bloomberg-climate-pledge-coal.html
Bio-mass as “renewable” is both a scientific joke, and illogical and impractical
Cutting trees down, requires double the amount of burned wood to match coal, more to match efficient natural gas
Less than half efficient at best,
Total production 1% — a joke
Europe has ten years of data and experience w renewables, all w negative and worse than expected benchmark outcomes
https://www.unionleader.com/opinion/op-eds/another-view-with-steve-goreham-the-overlooked-error-with-biomass/article_bd79c2da-88e7-5d76-9d40-46558a8b9dae.html
The old alchemists dream to “make” one substance be worth more than it actually is, become something it isn’t and cannot be through a seemingly magical process.
Renewable energy through industrialization — joke
I think science is being ignored, or not understood
Laws of Thermodynamics
Energy exists in many forms, such as heat, light, chemical energy, and electrical energy. Energy is the ability to bring about change or to do work. Thermodynamics is the study of energy.
First Law of Thermodynamics:
Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed.
The total amount of energy and matter in the Universe remains constant, merely changing from one form to another.
The First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved, it cannot be created or destroyed. In essence, energy can be converted from one form into another.
There is no free lunch.
--Change consumption. Drastically.
--Change lifestyle.
--De-aggregate. Eliminate cities.
--Environmental harmony, true closed system sustainability.
--Population decrease. 'Soylent Green' (JK)
Yes, IF all the above were done, and the net energy needs could be met with tree waste, and tree farms bio-mass is feasible
And then there’s the dishonesty of data—“trees” aren’t the same
Most tree farms are soft woods like pine and fir, the density of these trees is a tenth of hardwoods, and grow in a fraction of the time
And thus, cutting down forests of trees that contain hardwoods cannot be calculated into this biomass as they cannot be used unless a 30, 50, 100 year plan is involved
I.e. an 40-foot hardwood tree with a 18-inch diameter can weigh as much as 10,000 pounds while a 50-foot pine tree with a 12-inch diameter will only weigh as much as 2,000.
BUT
We know this won’t be done, nor tree harvesting contained to farms
The poor and under regulated or corrupt will sell its land, it’s trees and it’s peoples for profit
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/08/18/is-biomass-really-renewable/
I think I may be missing something critical; I thought the issue was CO2 emissions causing global warming and the end of life , etc etc
I thought it was established trees were the primary means to scrub and remove CO2 emissions
Yet, under this notion of a Green Society and it’s “renewable” energy is bio-mass, the largest percentage category
And bio-mass is primarily trees?
So the plan is to cut down trees, the primary means to scrub CO2, then burn them, in order to help the environment?
Someone’s crazy
Beyond all this, and to highlight what I think is “the point” of Moore’s documentary “the Planet of the Humans”, renewable energy aren’t the answer
Renewables aren’t renewable
I was around solar pv panels for years n never saw them renew, repopulate, fornicate or have little solar panels
I never saw them even make out, let alone 2nd base
Green isn’t green
If Solar Panels Are So Clean, Why Do They Produce So Much Toxic Waste? Forbes 2018
“The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in 2016 estimated there was about 250,000 metric tonnes of solar panel waste in the world at the end of that year. IRENA projected that this amount could reach 78 million metric tonnes by 2050...
Solar panels often contain lead, cadmium, and other toxic chemicals that cannot be removed without breaking apart the entire panel. “Approximately 90% of most PV modules are made up of glass,” notes San Jose State environmental studies professor Dustin Mulvaney. “However, this glass often cannot be recycled as float glass due to impurities. Common problematic impurities in glass include plastics, lead, cadmium and antimony.”
There is NOWHERE to retire them safely—how good can that be?
And there currently is no mandated plan by state or federal to retire, and recycle broke or old panels
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/05/23/if-solar-panels-are-so-clean-why-do-they-produce-so-much-toxic-waste/
Occasio's Green New Deal a Good One, Smart One, Doable? That would be NO.
Not according to a 100% bi-partisan vote against it."Senate UNANIMOUSLY votes down Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal 57-0 with high profile Democrats joining Republicans to show their disapproval for the radical plan as she charges the GOP with wrecking the world."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6853499/Senate-votes-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortezs-Green-New-Deal-57-0.html
We ARE killing this world. We are terrible stewards of this amazing Earth. Our lack of appreciation, lack of understanding of our utter reliance on her, cruelty, waste, and greed are mind-boggling. We will be held accountable to her Creator. I love Gaia.
Renewable energy just isn't the answer.
